![]()
From a letter to Nathanael Barney, 6th Mo 7, 1847
(NOTE: Nathanael Barney was Lucretia’s cousin.)
. . . . Long years’ reflection and observation have convinced & confirmed me in the opinion, that our Select body, as also the Hierarchy or Eceliastical establishments, & privileged orders in all sects, are the main obstacles to progress-- and until the true Freedom of Christ--the equality of the Brethren is better understood, we shall do little by organizing & re-organizing. So believing I visited ‘our Brethren’ & spake against Select Mgs. & in favor of Women’s Rights, but producing no other effect on the Powers that be than increased opposition. In N.Y. Select Mg. I repeated the heresy, & was denounced by G. F. White. Nothg. daunted I bearded that Lion-- After Mg. Amos Willets told me many were dissatisfied-- I answered, that ‘it wd. not surprise me if all were.’ He retorted, "the fire brand which thee failed to kindle in Philada. Y[early]. M[eetingj. thee has brot. here, & it wd. have been better for you to have stayed at home." I laid my hand on his arm, saying, "Amos, how little thou understands me"!
Later in the letter Mott describes a Boston meeting of "30 or 40 Reformers of various classes," including Ralph Waldo Emerson, William Lloyd Garrison, and Charles Sumner, who met at Theodore Parker’s home to discuss strategies for achieving their goals of abolition of slavery and sectarian religion. The ever-optimistic Mott concludes, "These Reform Meetings seem to be the best substitute for the dry formal sectarian gatherings -- which the ‘signs of the times’ indicate are drawing to an end."
And, in keeping with the letter’s iconoclastic tone, she signs it "yours for free speech -- -- L. Mott."
<< Back
![]()