The 2001 Quaker Peace Roundtable:

WORKSHOP: What Can the Bible teach Us About Peacemaking?  -- 4

Ron Mock 

3. God is Truth

            We are used to affirming that “the truth will set you free.” What we mean by that is often obscure. The Biblical portrait of God as Truth, as the personification of this ideal, has implications which are important for peacemaking.

              Right off the bat, it becomes pretty much impossible for a biblical peacemaker to succumb to thoroughgoing relativism. Sure, different cultures do things differently, and there is no automatic standing for a member of one culture to criticize another based on its difference.  But if God personifies Truth, then there is a Standard  to which all cultures, and all persons, are accountable.  Or, to put the point in more Gandhian terms, there is Truth toward which we all should aspire to grow.

              Conflict becomes largely a process by which the disputants are invited by God to learn more about Truth, from each other and from the context of their disputing. Biblical peacemakers are pushed to approach issues with humility. God knows everything, but we don’t. The Bible has plenty of accounts of God using surprising people (or even donkeys, whirlwinds, or bushes) to teach the devout something crucial about Truth. 

              Thus, the peacemaker, knowing that she sees only “through a glass darkly” whereas God sees everything clearly, learns to listen to everyone (and, I suppose in some way) to everything, expecting to hear the voice of God. She listens in Meeting, of course, and to her mentors.  But she also listens to her enemies, even the worst of them; and even to the natural order.  I don’t know what I think about the notion of natural law, but the Biblical lesson seems to be to listen wherever that of God can be found.  And nature is certainly one of those places.

              Conversely, if God may be expected to teach through anyone, then in order for Truth to be one, everyone must have a voice. Having a way to be heard is a basic human need, a requirement for finding and doing God’s will (and, thus, a factor in deciding what is a true “minimum wage” as we will discuss below).          

            If Truth is an attribute of God and the ultimate good, then we can rely on the truthful to be good for us, and for everyone else.  Evil may be understood as distance from Truth. Anything that is true cannot harm us. Certainly they don’t bribe or take bribes: they want choices to be made on their merits. But biblical peacemakers go much further. They refuse to cut   any moral corners. They don’t manipulate facts, or deceive. They are transparent to their friends and their enemies.  The last thing a biblical peacemaker wants is for anyone to make a choice while laboring under a misconception.  

            Faith in the benefits of seeking Truth, and humility about one’s own grasp of it, gives Biblical peacemakers a renewed respect for authorities outside themselves.  Friends submit leadings to the Meeting to be sure to confirm their Truthfulness.  This is an expression of both humility and faith out of respect for Truth.  Biblical peacemakers show similar respect for anyone, or any group, who shares the Meeting’s advantages in seeking Truth: better connections with reality’s immense variety, and with the needs and wants of other people; better capacity to reflect, independent of one’s own passions or self-interest; more opportunity to coordinate one’s own actions with others. Democratic legislatures score very highly on these variables, as do judges in common law traditions amid effective adversarial process. If either agency tells you not to sell coffee at 180 degrees through a drive up window, you can be fairly confident their edicts hew closely to Truth, closer than you are likely to be able to do with your limited contacts and unconscious biases.  

            Because biblical peacemakers believe Truth and Goodness are both attributes of God, they go into conflict humbly, expecting to learn from any quarter, trying to give voice to everyone (and maybe even every thing) affected by the dispute.  They are transparent in their own lives, and encourage it in others. They acknowledge the strengths of those who are in a better position to assess the Truth in an issue. They tend to find their worlds populated by legitimate authorities, and accord them due deference rather than pridefully assuming their own superiority at discerning Truth.  

4. God is merciful and just            

            If God can be both merciful and just, then both must be possible at the same time.  Christians emphasize the aspect of God’s mercy that leads to forgiveness for our sins.  Believers who want to be Christ-like must live in the tension between mercy and justice, working for both at the same time.  Like God’s, our forgiveness is unconditional.  But reconciliation may not be complete without  justice.  South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation commissions are only one very promising experiment in finding ways to meld mercy and justice.

              Peacemakers have to “separate persons from problems,” as Fisher and Ury put it.[1]  The Bible teaches that the only part of this world that can last forever is the human soul. God intended us to live in reconciled relationships. Jesus died to help everyone reconcile to God, and each other, for all eternity. Imagine what an eternal reconciled relationship would be like.  50-year marriages would seem like first dates. Even if I annoy you now, so you drop me to the bottom of your list of “People I’d Like to Get to Know Better in Heaven,” eternity is a very long time.  Eventually you would have crossed everyone else off that list, and it will be my turn.  And we would still have an eternity in front of us to get to know one another.

              Of course, by then, under the influence of God and everyone else in Heaven, even I will be a pretty nice guy.  So you’ll probably find the experience surprisingly enjoyable. 

              Now consider your worst enemy.  According to the Bible, Jesus died for him, too, intending to make a way for him to come into eternal life, too. Maybe he didn’t even make your list of “People I’d Like to Get to Know.”  But God’s will is that you and he will also have forever to get acquainted. Eventually you and he are slated to become closer than brothers. 

              No wonder the Bible, which speaks so clearly about justice, also exhorts us to be quick to forgive.  Of course we are to stand with the weak and oppressed, especially when they do not have access to means to meet their needs, and have no way to be heard.  But even the oppressor is beloved by God, and so deserves our love.  And even the best of us need God’s forgiveness, and so do not have grounds to withhold forgiveness from someone else.

              So far we have focused on Biblical themes that draw mostly on God’s nature and relationship with us.  We have been looking outward or forward to God’s paradise – where we can see clearly pure Goodness, Truth, Mercy and Justice, and no one’s needs will go unmet.  This is a consistent Biblical theme – the “Kingdom of God” is coming off in the future, or even in the next world.  But it also has already come, at the Creation, in the form of the nation of Israel (especially in the time of the Judges), and most powerfully in the life of Jesus.  So Biblical peacemakers can justifiably think of themselves as working in the midst of God’s realm.   Because it is partly here already, peacemakers can have confidence that the promise of a loving, just, merciful, true omnipotent God is good for us, as well as for the next world.

              But now I want to turn our attention to some features of this world, even in its unredeemed aspects.  We start with a foundational point, one implied by the Creation iself and reaffirmed in many ways throughout the Bible.


[1]  Roger Fisher and William Ury, Getting to Yes (2d Edition, Penguin, 1991), especially Chapter 2. 

Next >>>

<<< Back

To the Roundtable Schedule, with Papers and Notes

<<< Back to Home