QCEA Logo

Square Ambiorix 50, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
Tel: +32 2 230 49 35 Fax: +32 2 230 63 70
E-mail us
aisbl - N° d'entreprise 0420.346.728

Peace

Human Rights

Economic Justice

 

What is QCEA?

Structure & Staff

Contact Us

 

Take Action

Subscriptions and Membership

Donate

Study Tours

Internships

 

Around Europe

Briefing Papers

Occasional Papers and other publications

Ordering Printed Copies

 

History

Meeting Rooms Available

 
 
The Future of Europe: Spiritual Values and Citizenship
QCEA Responses to the Convention on the Future of Europe

Draft articles on The Union’s Institutions
Part 1, Title IV
of the draft Constitutional Treaty

QCEA Comments: 12 May 2003

  • Inclusive and gender-neutral language must be used in this, and all other sections of the Constitutional Treaty.
  • The primary objective of the European Central Bank, and all other Union institutions, must be to further the values and objectives of the Union: the means used to do this should not be specified in the Constitutional Treaty.

Detailed comments and suggested amendments:

Article 16a: The European Council Chair

In this Article, as well as in Article 18a: The President of the European Commission and Article 19: The Foreign Minister, the respective individuals are consistently referred to with the male pronoun ‘he’. Considering the EU’s commitment to gender equality this language is inappropriate.

Throughout the Constitutional Treaty the use of gender-neutral language must be ensured. This is particularly important when describing office holders of considerable power as these are the positions where gender equality is still to be realised in practice.

Article 21: The European Central Bank

Paragraph 2 states that ‘The primary objective of the Bank shall be to maintain price stability’. Price stability is a policy instrument, not an end in itself. By giving price stability such a prominent position, a specific economic ideology is enshrined in the Constitutional Treaty. The choice of economic strategies and tools should be a matter of policy debate, not a pre-determined decision.

The wording of this paragraph not only specifies the economic instrument to be used, but goes so far as to state that supporting general economic policies which contribute to the achievement of the Union’s objectives is subordinate to the objective of price stability. This is clearly perverse: the European Central Bank, as all institutions of the EU, must work towards the achievement of the EU’s objectives. If price stability proves not to meet these objectives, different economic tools must be found.

We suggest the following wording:

21.2: “The primary objective of the Bank shall be to contribute to the achievement of the Union’s objectives. Without prejudice to these objectives, the Bank shall maintain price stability.

There is also a need in this Article to describe the democratic accountability of the Bank. While this may be planned to appear in Part 2, a brief description would be appropriate here, to make clear the Bank’s place within the democratic institutional structure of the EU.

Return to top of page 


Further Information on The Future of Europe
Briefing Papers on the Constitutional Treaty and Referenda
Briefing Papers on the Militarisation of the EU
Spiritual Values and Citizenship Project
- Information and analysis
- Briefing Papers on Spiritual Values and Citizenship
- Calendar of events (archive)
- Contributions to the project
- Values Matter: Quakers Reflect on Europe. Final report of the Future of Europe project
- QCEA Responses to the Convention on the Future of Europe
- Reports from QCEA Associate Members’ Conference on The Future of Europe
 

Return to top of page

Return to the Future of Europe main page


| Home Page | Site Map | Contact Webmaster | eXTReMe Tracker |